But halfers would argue that the heads outcome is twice as likely when she’s awakened on Monday than when she’s awakened on Tuesday.
Do not hit the like button or the dislike button, at least not yet. I want you to consider a problem that’s been one of the most controversial in math and philosophy over the past 20 years. There is no consensus answer. So I want you to listen to the problem and then vote for the answer you prefer using the like and dislike buttons.
Okay, here is the setup: Sleeping Beauty volunteers to be the subject of an experiment. And before it starts she’s informed of the procedure. On Sunday night she will be put to sleep. And then a fair coin will be flipped. If that coin comes up heads, she’ll be awakened on Monday and then put back to sleep. If the coin comes up tails she will also be awakened on Monday and put back to sleep. But then she will be awakened on Tuesday as well and then put back to sleep. Now each time she gets put back to sleep she will forget that she was ever awakened. In the brief period anytime she’s awake she will be told no information. But she’ll be asked one question: What do you believe is the probability that the coin came up heads? So how should she answer? Feel free to pause the video and answer the question for yourself right now.
This was my reaction after hearing the problem for the first time. I mean the intuitive answer that pops into my head is clearly one in three. It could be the Monday when it came up heads. Or it could be the Monday when it came up tails. Or it could be the Tuesday when it came up tails. But you know what’s really interesting is you just answered that the probability of a coin coming up heads is one-third. I think a lot of this comes down to what specific question is asked of her. What is the probability that a fair coin flipped gives heads? That’s 50 percent. What is the probability that the coin came up heads? I would say the answer is a third from her perspective. Yeah it’s it’s remarkably the same question.
The simple reason why Sleeping Beauty should say the probability of heads is one half is because she knows the coin is fair. Nothing changes between when the coin is flipped and when she wakes up and she knew for a fact that she would be woken up and she receives no new information when that happens. Imagine that instead of flipping the coin after she’s asleep, the experimenters flip the coin first and ask her immediately: “what’s the probability that the coin came up heads?” Well she would certainly say one half so why should anything change after she goes to sleep and wakes up. This is known as the Halfer position.
But there is another way to look at it. Others would argue that something does change when she’s awakened. I mean it seems like she gets no new information. There are no calendars no one tells her anything and she knew that she would be woken up. But she actually learns something important. She learns that she’s gone from existing in a reality where there are two possible states. The coin came up either heads or tails to existing in a reality where there are three possible states: Monday heads, Monday tails or Tuesday tails. And therefore she should assign equal probability to each of these three outcomes where Heads only occurred in one. So the probability that the coin came up heads is one-third. This is known as the Thirder position.
Now I know it seems wrong to suggest that a fair coin should have a one-third probability of coming up heads but that’s because the question she’s asked is subtly different. The implied question is: “Given you’re awake, what’s the probability that the coin came up heads?” And that is one-third. Now Halfers would counter that just because there are three possible outcomes doesn’t mean they are each equally likely. In the Monty Hall problem for example the contestant ultimately has to choose between two doors. But it’d be wrong to assign them 50/50 odds. The prize is actually twice as likely to be behind one door than the other. In the Sleeping Beauty problem we know a heads outcome and a tails outcome are equally likely. But Halfers would argue that the heads outcome is twice as likely when she’s awakened on Monday than when she’s awakened on Tuesday. The chance of waking up on Monday with heads is 50 percent and the chance of waking up on Monday or Tuesday with tails should be 50 percent, so the tails probability gets split across two days 25 percent each. However, if you repeat the experiment by flipping a coin over and over, you find that Sleeping Beauty wakes up a third of the time with Monday heads, a third of the time with Monday tails, and a third of the time with Tuesday tails, not 50-25-25 like the previous analysis would suggest.
If Sleeping Beauty is asked “What’s the probability the coin came up heads?”, the answer may seem obvious to some, but to others, the other answer seems just as obvious. Hundreds of philosophy papers have been published on this problem over the past 22 years.
The same argument can also be used to suggest that we are living in a simulation. It is possible that computing technology will improve so dramatically that it will be possible to create a completely realistic simulation of our world, and create unlimited copies of that simulation. If this is the case, then it is likely that we are living in a simulation.
To further consider this, let’s say there is a soccer game between Brazil and Canada, where the odds are 80:20 in Brazil’s favor. A researcher puts you to sleep before the game starts. If Brazil wins, they will wake you up once, but if Canada wins, they will wake you up 30 times in a row. When you are woken up, who do you think won the game? The thirder would say Canada, but most people would say Brazil.
If Brazil plays Canada five times and the experiment is repeated each time, if you say Brazil each time you are woken up you will be right about four out of five of the games. However, if you say Canada each time you will be wrong about four games, but right 30 times in a row when you are asked about Canada’s one victory. If you stand to win a bet by correctly answering the question, then you should bet on Canada. If you want to correctly pick the winner of more of the games, then you should say Brazil. This is the heart of the dispute between Halfers and Thirders in the Sleeping Beauty problem. To be right about the outcome of the coin tosses, you should say the probability of heads is a half; however, if you want to answer more questions correctly, then you should say one-third.
To develop intuition about probability, work through scenarios or run simulations, like for the Sleeping Beauty problem. Brilliant offers probability courses that walk you through lots of situational probability questions. With Brilliant, you can model the real world with math and expand your understanding of cutting edge topics like AI and machine learning.
Brilliant already has thousands of lessons and new ones are added every month. If you want to get started with Brilliant’s annual premium subscription, they’re giving 20 percent off to the first 200 people to sign up via this link.